WOMAN AT THE WHEEL
March 24th, 2001
Navigating traffic court can be
tricky
Traffic act record could skyrocket
your insurance costs
Krystyna Lagowski
Brian Lawrie remembers the day
he found his client, a 70-year-old
woman, hiding behind the staircase
at Old City Hall court.
"She felt like a criminal,"
he recalls. "A police officer
had charged her with careless driving,
and someone told her that careless
driving carries the potential for
six months in jail, which is in
the Act, it terrified the life out
of her.
Lawrie, the founder and CEO of
Provincial Offences Informed Traffic
Ticket Services (POINTTS), was able
to calm his client. "A few
months earlier, she was driving
home, looked over at a store window
and the traffic in front of her
stopped. She collided with another
car, but there were no injuries,
no major damage. It was just momentary
inattention, which doesn't mean
careless driving. People who have
never been in court before find
it intimidating and embarrassing."
As a former police officer, Lawrie
has more courtroom stories than
you can shake a speeding ticket
at. "An individual will walk
in and expect that if they say `I
didn't do it' or `I didn't mean
to do it', that it'll carry the
day, and of course, it doesn't."
Robb Knapper, sergeant of corporate
communications for Toronto Police
Services, agrees. "You can't
just call me a liar. There's a burden
of proof on you. I'm doing a job.
I'm sitting at the foot of the Don
Valley Parkway for a purpose , to
stop people who are doing 140 kilometers
an hour in a 90 kilometer zone."
Presenting a case in front of a
justice of the peace, even in traffic
court, requires knowing the proper
procedures. "When you say that
you're not guilty, you are saying
to the court that you have the necessary
knowledge to defend yourself. And
that includes court procedures,
rules of evidence, time limitations,
all the factors involved in the
provincial offenses act ‹
those two words are quite a mouthful,"
quips Lawrie.
Just because there's a mistake
on your ticket doesn't mean you
can walk away. "The courts
and the legislators realize that
the police officer is writing this
ticket with the pad on his or her
lap, in the dark at 2 a.m. under
a dome light. You want a trial on
the facts, as opposed to the paperwork."
Lawrie recalls an incident in 1974
when he was still a police officer,
where he was at the scene of an
accident. "There were two driver's
licences in front of me, for the
two people involved in the traffic
accident. I wrote the other person's
name on the ticket, but gave it
to the person responsible.
"They came to court, thinking
they were going to breeze through
because there was somebody else's
name on the ticket, but they were
convicted."
Michael Turk, lawyer for the Automobile
Protection Association, says many
individuals will plead guilty just
to bring the cost of the ticket
down.
"Ninety per cent of the pleas
are guilty pleas," he says.
"If you have no experience
fighting in court, you don't know
what to expect in a plea bargain.
You don't have a point of reference."
Turk says people don't understand
the ramifications of pleading guilty."
They are always saying they're
worried about points. "I tell
them, that's the last thing you
should be worried about. You could
get a record under the Highway Traffic
Act and it could skyrocket your
insurance costs."
Lawrie agrees, it's convictions
that matter. "Convictions stay
around for five years. Your car
insurance rate can go up to $5,000.
That's tantamount to a driver's
licence suspension for a lot of
people because they can't afford
it."
People who are charged with a Highway
Traffic Act offence are guilty,
if they are guilty of anything,
of a minor regulatory mistake. "We're
not dealing with criminals,"
says Lawrie.